l up there. I'm sure I'm offending people now so I'm going to shut up and
apologise!
On Sunday, April 7, 2013, Owain Lloyd wrote:
> Aucra exhausts.... (The ones that sound like farts). Not many engines
> sounds bad to me but Acuras and Harleys are wel
>
> On Sunday, April 7, 2013, Owain Lloyd wrote:
>
> Oh god I know! They sound even worse than pointless 'emergency' sirens.
> Definitely one of my top 'angry hates' :) what do people see (or should I
> say hear) in that awful racket?
>
> I think all loud noises should be judged by the benchmark of 'would you
> rather your toddler kept sleeping or should they be woken up to experience
> said sound?' If its not worth being interrupted from an interesting
> conversation from (and a small block ford usually is), I don't want to hear
> it!
>
> - angry Owain in noisy manhattan.
>
>
> On Sunday, April 7, 2013, wrote:
>
> Good noise a v8... bad noise another asshole on a harly with open
> pipes.....my 650 single dr sounds way better than a harly and a gold star
> is
> even better
>
>
>
> ---- Original Message ----
> From: MWood24020 <MWood24020@aol.com>
> To: tsmit <tsmit@shaw.ca>; CoolVT <CoolVT@aol.com>
> Cc: tigers <tigers@autox.team.net>
> Sent: Sun, Apr 7, 2013 4:31 pm
> Subject: Re: [Tigers] Chambered exhaust systems?
>
>
> Of course, we also need to differentiate "good noise" from "bad noise"...
> ;-)
>
>
> In a message dated 4/7/2013 1:25:14 P.M. Pacific Daylight Time,
> tsmit@shaw.ca writes:
>
> True enough, but the LAT73/LAT74 headers and exhaust, that these mufflers
> were part of, were not really intended for stock engines.
>
> My Tiger came to me with a five-bolt 289 with ported and polished heads, a
> Holley 600 and F4B manifold, and a pretty lopey cam. 'Quiet' was not
> really in its repertoire, although sticking with a 2 inch exhaust system
> does
> help keep the overall noise level down compared with 2 1/4 or 2 1/2 inch
> pipe, at the expense of some performance at the high end.
>
> Theo
>
> On 4/7/2013 1:58 PM, _CoolVT@aol.com_ (mailto:CoolVT@aol.com) wrote:
>
>
> I can tell you that in using cheap old glass paks with a stock engine and
> the same mufflers with a hopped up 302....they are much, much louder with
> the 302. I shouldn't think a stock engine would be that difficult to
> muffle.
> Mark L
>
>
> In a message dated 4/7/2013 3:37:15 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time,
> _tsmit@shaw.ca_ (mailto:tsmit@shaw.ca) writes:
>
> Mike,
> Here's a picture of what I think are the Mitchell mufflers - these are
> what was on my Tiger when I got it.
>
> For the rest of you that won't get the picture:
>
> The body is 24" long, 3x5" oval, 2" in and out. Contrary to what I
> remembered, the hangers attach 5" rearward from the front of the muffler
> body - there is only about 20 inches between where the hangers attach on
> the chassis and the rear axle tube.
>
> I do recall the front of these mufflers pretty much touching the
> rearward part of the underbody X frame, just behind the little exhaust
> pipe notch in the X. The sound of these mufflers was pretty aggressive,
> but it went well with the rest of the system and engine.
>
> I would also be concerned with the amount of sound suppression that's
> possible in a small diameter muffler such as the chambered ones in the
> link below. It may be that with proper choice of all the internal
> volumes, they get noise cancellation at most of the frequencies of
> interest, but it seems to me that the overall result would still be
> pretty dependent on the rest of the package, i.e. engine displacement,
> cam, and the diameter of the rest of the exhaust.
>
> Theo
>
>
> On 4/7/2013 10:28 AM, _MWood24020@aol.com_ (mailto:MWood24020@aol.com)
> wrote:
> > Thanks, Theo. I was looking around the 'net yesterday and saw this:
> > http://www.classicchambered.com/
> > Concern is that there would really be minimal muffling. Upside would be
> > installation, particularly in terms of avoiding the "mufflers hanging
> low"
> > issue/look we have with our cars.
> >
> > I also had another friend tell me he installed the new tech, small
> diameter
> > glasspacks on his Tiger with very good results.
> >
> > I'm not a big fan of Flowmaster mufflers. I've yet to have an install
> where
> > there wasn't some droning, regardless as to whether running an H or X
> > pipe. They do sound good under throttle and are made very well,
> though!
>
> [demime 1.01d removed an attachment of type image/jpeg which had a name of
> IMG_1333.JPG]
> _______________________________________________
>
> _ti
_______________________________________________
tigers@autox.team.net
Archive: http://www.team.net/archive
Unsubscribe: http://autox.team.net/mailman/options/tigers/mharc@autox.team.net
|