Hmm! You have both a Porsche 911 and a Tiger. Me too.
It's my son's ambition to own every sports car I ever had, and at the
same time. He is well on his way.
Have sound on:
*Have sound on: * <
http://tigersunited.com/articles/sl-mc/SteveLaifman.asp >
I also have a new set of LAT-27 Tri-Y Tiger cast headers on the shelves
(as does "Mooney" (Sean Ford).
They are said to add just a few horsepower, but look great.
< http://tigersunited.com/resources/parts_service/pp-lat27.asp >
Larry Paulick has a few words on it:
<
http://www.tigersunited.com/techtips/PaulickExhaust/pt-PaulickExhaust1.asp >
I think they would look best with either an aluminum ceramachrome
finish, or the fragile black porcelainized finish, like my Jag XK120M.
Do all your fit checks, hammering and grinding before the finish. Some
manufacturing errors may exist on this accessory.
Steve
Steve Laifman
Editor
http://TigersUnited.com
Would U. Believe wrote:
> I was wondering if anyone has a strong opinion about whether a Tiger is
> really better off with headers versus the original cast iron exhaust
> manifolds. I think the obvious benefit of headers is the gain in
> horsepower, but the tradeoff seems to be in the added difficulty in
> maintaining the car, given the tight engine bay. Anyone have an opinion re?
> I'd like to have a set of the original manifolds that it seems everyone
> seems to have junked because they are so restrictive. Are there any out
> there and available? I'm just thinking that for me, regular manifolds might
> be enough... I'd like to try some out. Thanks. M
_______________________________________________
Tigers@autox.team.net
Donate: http://www.team.net/donate.html
Archive: http://www.team.net/archive
Forums: http://www.team.net/forums
|