That is utter horseshit. When TAC came into existence, Tigers weren't
worth enough to justify your assertion. It was about preserving the integrity
of the marque.
In a message dated 3/22/2010 4:49:44 P.M. Pacific Daylight Time,
spook01@comcast.net writes:
Yeah except I remember all the discussion when the idea of tac came about.
The reason for tac is and was about preserving value. Bucks.
All this altruistic crap is pretty amusing.
Sent from my Verizon Wireless Phone
----- Reply message -----
From: "MAURO D'ANGELO" <m_dangelo@verizon.net>
Date: Mon, Mar 22, 2010 6:32 PM
Subject: [Tigers] tiger originality / authenticity
To: "Tom Hall" <modtiger@comcast.net>, "Thomas Witt"
<atwittsend@verizon.net>
Cc: <tigers@autox.team.net>
It is quite disgusting to think that there are people would actually
convert
a car of any kind for the purpose of stealing money from the poor buyer who
thinks he or she is getting the real deal, whatever that might be. The
fact
that the TAC program exists is nothing more than a testament to the
lowlifes
who would create bogus Tigers to make a profit on some poor guy who will
never get his money back. I got mine TACed so that my car will forever be
branded for what it is (a MK1A), even though I won't be selling it. I
would
recommend to everybody to get their cars TACed. It would be really nice to
be able to get all surviving Tigers in the world on the registry.
The opposite side of the spectrum is the guy who frowns at a car because
the
owner has made small, reversible changes to personalize a car to his or
her
liking. I say do what you want to your own car, as long as you don't do
anything that can't be reversed. If it needs repairs, major or minor,
repair it, though. Mauro
On 3/22/10 7:14 PM, "Tom Hall" <modtiger@comcast.net> wrote:
> At 11:58 AM 3/22/2010, you wrote:
>> I believe their primary intention is to disqualify cars that are
>> obviously Alpines with transferred Tiger parts. In the end it could
>> be possible that they may not issue a TAC sticker yet not define the
>> car as an "Alger."
>
> For the umpteenth time, No one in the TAC community ever labels
> anything with it's certification other than Tigers. The failing of a
> TAC inspection in no way brands the vehicle as an "Alger" or any
> other "thing". There are other considerations, but body panels,
> floor panels, etc. are not normally reasons for TAC rejection. Be
> aware that attempting to convert an early Tiger into a MkII for its
> potential increase in value, is also not viewed as an appropriate
"repair".
>
>
> Tom Hall
> ModTiger Engineering LLC
> www.tigerengineering.net
> _______________________________________________
> Tigers@autox.team.net
> Donate: http://www.team.net/donate.html
> Archive: http://www.team.net/archive
> Forums: http://www.team.net/forums
> Unsubscribe/Manage:
> http://autox.team.net/mailman/options/tigers/m_dangelo@verizon.net
_______________________________________________
Tigers@autox.team.net
Donate: http://www.team.net/donate.html
Archive: http://www.team.net/archive
Forums: http://www.team.net/forums
Unsubscribe/Manage: http:/
/autox.team.net/mailman/options/tigers/spook01@comcast.net
_______________________________________________
Tigers@autox.team.net
Donate: http://www.team.net/donate.html
Archive: http://www.team.net/archive
Forums: http://www.team.net/forums
Unsubscribe/Manage:
http://autox.team.net/mailman/options/tigers/mwood24020@aol.com
_______________________________________________
Tigers@autox.team.net
Donate: http://www.team.net/donate.html
Archive: http://www.team.net/archive
Forums: http://www.team.net/forums
|