tigers
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [Tigers] Thunderbird 302s

To: <fordlandia@sbcglobal.net>, <tigers@autox.team.net>
Subject: Re: [Tigers] Thunderbird 302s
From: "A. C. Tynes" <v8tracker@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 28 Sep 2008 16:53:23 -0500
Thanks, Bill. That was the exact info I was looking for. 

It looks like the simplest solution is to find the right donor car in the
first place.

A.C. Tynes

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Bill Waite [mailto:fordlandia@sbcglobal.net]
> Sent: Sunday, September 28, 2008 2:00 PM
> To: tigers@autox.team.net; A. C. Tynes
> Subject: Re: [Tigers] Thunderbird 302s
> 
> An excerpt from this web page: http://www.mre-
> books.com/ranger/cooling.html
> 
> "If you need a few more inches of room at the front of your motor a
> possibility worth considering is one of the short water pumps offered by
> Ford Motorsport. The standard rotation pump is designed to be used with V
> belt pulleys, part # M-8501-N, and is 1.5 inches shorter than the standard
> small block water pump. It must be used with a special pulley set M-8509-
> N. There's also a short pump for use with serpentine belts. It's part # M-
> 8509-A50. It's 1.75 inches shorter than the production water pumps and
> comes with a special front cover which has no provision for a mechanical
> fuel pump. It requires the use of a special alternator-mounting bracket M-
> 8511-C351 and a special steel 3-piece pulley set M-8509-L or M-8509-M for
> aluminum pulleys. 1991-93 5.0L Thunderbird and Cougar as well as 1994-95
> 5.0L Mustang all used a similar short water pump and front cover and can
> be an excellent choice for a donor vehicle to acquire your new V8 from."
> 
> Bill Waite
> Grand Rapids
> 
> --- On Sun, 9/28/08, A. C. Tynes <v8tracker@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> 
>       From: A. C. Tynes <v8tracker@gmail.com>
>       Subject: [Tigers] Thunderbird 302s
>       To: tigers@autox.team.net
>       Date: Sunday, September 28, 2008, 2:20 PM
> 
> 
>       I saw a mention on the Internet that the installed length of 302s in
> the
>       pre-94 Thunderbirds were as much as 2 inches shorter than in
> Mustangs.
>       Supposedly due to different front covers and
>        possibly different water pumps,
>       but very vague. Anyone know anything about this?
> 
> 
> 
>       A.C. Tynes
> 
>       New Orleans
>       _______________________________________________
>       Support Team.Net  http://www.team.net/donate.html
> 
>       You are subscribed as fordlandia@sbcglobal.net
> 
>       Tigers@autox.team.net
>       http://autox.team.net/mailman/listinfo/tigers
> 
>       http://www.team.net/archive
_______________________________________________
Support Team.Net  http://www.team.net/donate.html


Tigers@autox.team.net
http://autox.team.net/mailman/listinfo/tigers

http://www.team.net/archive

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>