In a message dated 8/6/2008 4:44:56 P.M. Pacific Daylight Time,
mrlau@charter.net writes:
I'll bet this could be argued every way that is possible. I don't think
there is very much difference and I'm pretty sure it would depend on what
other engine modifications were involved anyway.
I'm not sure that a F4B can support much more than a stock head, low cfm
4bbl combo, but it is period and Tiger correct, of course, and should
outperform
the FoMoCo cast iron equivalent from that era :-)
I would love to see a dyno plot of the Performer vs. F4B on that same motor,
though...my guess is that the "old school" manifold would get smoked, to say
nothing of the option of moving to the Performer RPM.
**************Looking for a car that's sporty, fun and fits in your budget?
Read reviews on AOL Autos.
(http://autos.aol.com/cars-BMW-128-2008/expert-review?ncid=aolaut00050000000017
)
_______________________________________________
Support Team.Net http://www.team.net/donate.html
Tigers@autox.team.net
http://autox.team.net/mailman/listinfo/tigers
http://www.team.net/archive
|