The quote "So are you getting 381 HP from your 260? I doubt it!"
is from your email of 6/16. That is your statement, not mine.
Your statement says you cast doubt on getting 381 HP from a 260. My response
was speculation on Doane Spencer achieving 400 HP from a Ford 260 using modern
engine parts because Doane was said to get 349 HP in 1965.
Believe me, I don't feel threatened by anything you say.
Jeff
Drmoonstone@aol.com wrote:
In a message dated 6/16/08 5:54:56 PM, jxnichols@sbcglobal.net writes:
"So are you getting 381 HP from your 260? I doubt it!"
Yes, got it on the dyno! Feel free to call me a liar anytime. No lie, but I did
bait everyone a little. Motor has a large arm, is bigger than 260, runs very
high compression and has custom made alu heads from Ford's F1 and Indy motor
program, full roller valve train. Mr. Begosian was a chief developer on the J
and K code motors. There really is nothing 260 about it anymore. The big gamble
is can I cool it. Joe wants to put a spray bar in front of the radiator. Also
drivability issues are still a concern!
So why do you feel so threatened by this?
A similar combination of components used on a 302 has produced 475hp and is
currently in a really fast Mustang running in the Central Valley.
Moonstone
**************
Gas prices getting you down? Search AOL Autos for fuel-efficient used cars.
(http://autos.aol.com/used?ncid=aolaut00050000000007)
_______________________________________________
Support Team.Net http://www.team.net/donate.html
Tigers@autox.team.net
http://autox.team.net/mailman/listinfo/tigers
http://www.team.net/archive
|