You would be correct...
Best Tiger = 16,000 pounds ($28,200)
It's amazing how I didn't notice the mistake until after the post was sent!
Same thing usually happens to me after I send stuff to my printer.
Paul
>From: <kasl@alltel.net>
>To: "Paul R. Breuhan"
><prbreuhan@hotmail.com>,<tigers@autox.team.net>,<alpines@autox.team.net>
>Subject: Re: Sunbeam Alpines & tigers in Print...
>Date: Tue, 11 Oct 2005 12:47:15 -0500
>
>I think you mean Best Tiger in category 2, #2.
> >
> > From: "Paul R. Breuhan" <prbreuhan@hotmail.com>
> > Date: 2005/10/11 Tue PM 12:20:30 CDT
> > To: tigers@autox.team.net, alpines@autox.team.net
> > Subject: Sunbeam Alpines & tigers in Print...
> >
> > If anyone cares or likes pictures or keeps track...
> >
> > ...the October 2005 issue of Thoroughbred and Classic Cars has a Buying
> > Wisedom Guide which features the Alpines and Tigers. Prominently
>pictured is
> > a nice red Tiger. A number of other vehicles are mentioned in this
>guide,
> > Corvette, Alfa, Marcos GT, etc...
> >
> > The article doesn't break any new ground but gives some values...
> >
> > (I used an online currency convertor for US dollars)
> > Good Alpine = 4500 pounds ($7,900)
> > Best Alpine = 7000 pounds ($12,300)
> >
> > Good Tiger = 13,000 ($22,900)
> > Best Alpine = 16,000 pounds ($28,200)
> >
> > I thought they were favorable prices for everyone.
> >
> > Also for Ford-Powered fans the cover features a better than original De
> > Tomaso Pantera and a nice write-up on it.
> >
> > Their website is...http://www.classiccarsmagazine.co.uk/
> >
> >
> > Paul
|