Thanks for the info.
Can you double check the Ford P/N for that Hi Rise manfold?
A C9OZ part was engineered in 1969, well after the Tiger production run.
Erich
----- Original Message -----
From: "Bob Palmer" <rpalmer@ucsd.edu>
To: "Kathy and Erich Coiner" <kathy.coiner@gte.net>; "Tiger List"
<tigers@autox.team.net>
Sent: Saturday, February 22, 2003 9:27 PM
Subject: RE: Edelbrock F4B
> Erich,
>
> TBON says on page 56, referring to the switch from the original Ford
> C90Z-9424-D HiRise manifold "The results were so favorable that the
> Edelbrock F4B instantly became the official LAT-1 manifold, with the
> provision that the hole for the temperature sending unit be drilled and
> tapped for the Smith sender used on the Tiger. The Tiger versions of the
> Cobra/Benevides manifold, with their Shelby American part numbers, were
> history before 100 had been cast." On page 57 is a picture of the
Edelbrock
> LAT-1 manifold. Although the resolution is poor, I don't see any hump or
> hole on the driver's side rear runner. There does appear to be a tapped
hole
> on the passenger's side rear runner for the vacuum hose to the power brake
> servo. It would seem that the only way to distinguish a Tiger OEM manifold
> is by the threads for the temperature sending unit.
>
>
> Bob Palmer
> rpalmer@ucsd.edu
> rpalmerbob@adelphia.net
|