Have to agree, the big Healeys were the best "affordable" cars around.
There were some good Rovers (well sedans) . . but in the same class as
Tigers, E-types (or XK120s), or big Healeys? I doubt it.
Let's keep the secret, though. . . .
have a friend (who didn't buy my Tiger and is suicidal) looking for a Tiger,
let me know1
David in Durango
>
> Chris, thanks for the heads up, but what a stupid choice for voting.
> They list the various cars, then omit the chance to vote for the Tiger
> and Healey, in favor of voting for a Rover.
>
> Its like saying the best German car is the Mercedes Unamog, a vehicle
> made for farmers and the army.
>
> I wonder how many Rovers have been for sale at the Jackson-Barrett
> auction lately.
>
> If you are going to vote, then put the entire slate on the ticket.
> Results showed the Jag have low votes, which makes me wonder
> who is voting.
>
> Nice article on Tiger, but like you said, a little inaccurate.
>
> Thanks for the alert.
>
> Larry
>
> Chris Thompson wrote:
> >
> > For those of you who might have missed this on the latest
> Forbes magazine
> > site - a mention of the Sunbeam Tiger! Article written by
> a friend of mine
> > who happens to own a Jaguar lightweight, not a Tiger, and
> the next mail is a
> > talk with him why he didn't check with someone who knew
> something about
> > Tigers before submitting this - still another claim to fame....
> >
> > http://www.forbes.com/2002/05/27/0527feat.html
> >
> > Chris Thompson
> > B382000331
> > 63 E type
> > AH 3000 next
>
> #################################################################
> #################################################################
> #################################################################
> #####
> #####
> #####
> #################################################################
> #################################################################
> #################################################################
|