tigers
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Email fixed, Back to the torque question

To: <tigers@autox.team.net>, "Bruce Richards" <bdrtx@swbell.net>
Subject: Re: Email fixed, Back to the torque question
From: "Tom Witt" <wittsend@jps.net>
Date: Sun, 5 May 2002 16:48:11 -0700
Bruce,
  Don't be tempted to go beyond the seemingly low torque settings. I made
this error and promptly snapped a bolt on a Ranchero. Might I add it was a
bolt that could not be extracted by an extraction tool (at least as one
would commonly have). My option was to either pay a pro (it was a Sunday
none the less) or drive 60 miles and probe the self serve wrecking yard. I
chose the latter. Thus, half a day latter and some $25 less (this was 1988)
I bolted the new pressure plate in to very exacting minimal specs (with loc
tite).
Tom Witt B9470101

----- Original Message -----
From: "Bruce Richards" <bdrtx@swbell.net>
To: "Tigers" <tigers@autox.team.net>
Sent: Sunday, May 05, 2002 7:36 AM
Subject: Email fixed, Back to the torque question


> Sorry Guy's, (and Gals),
>     I believe I fixed the problem.  Anyway let me put this out one more
> time, I'd like to get my engine back together before it hits 100 outside.
>
>       I was trying to find out the correct torque setting for the pressure
> plate.  Monroe's book say's 12-20 lbs.  That just seems a little on the
lean
> side for me.
>
> Also I have installed a little bit hotter cam and was trying to figure out
a
> timing setting range for it without getting too aggressive.  The cam I got
> for it is a CompCams high energy 268 268 Adv, 218 218 Duration, .456 .456
> valve lift,  with Rhoads lifters and roller tip rockers.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Bruce Richards
> B9470147

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>