tigers
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Doane's overbored 260's

To: Tom Hall <modtiger@attbi.com>
Subject: Re: Doane's overbored 260's
From: Larry Paulick <larry.p@erols.com>
Date: Mon, 25 Feb 2002 08:44:13 -0500
Hi Group.  The little I have read about Doane Spencer, indicated that he was
really a remarkable individual.

Is there something written about him, and exactly what he did on the Tigers,
that is available?

Larry

Tom Hall wrote:

> At 10:59 PM 2/24/2002 +0000, you wrote:
> >So that's the reason Doane Spencer used a sleeved, 5-bolt 289, bored to
> >Tiger, 260 specs.
>
>          No that's not the reason Doane used the sleeve process for his
> motors.  He did it to produce a variable deck height.  Remember that these
> were the early days of small block preparation, and individual creativity
> and development made all the difference in the world.  Doane used 289
> gaskets which fit the OD of the sleeves and left the sleeves protruding
> from the block at the crush height of the gasket.  This allowed the sleeve
> to essentially contact the head surface and protect the gasket from the
> full cylinder pressure and heat generation.  I don't know, and I doubt that
> few do, exactly what static compression ratio he designed for , but I'll
> bet it was well into the mid teens.  Head gasket failure was typically a
> major failure point for small block Fords running this kind of
> compression.  Leave it to Doane to figure out a way to make more power and
> with higher reliability than the other competitors of his day.  He
> certainly had a magic touch and from todays perspective it's a shame he
> selected or was selected to provide his talent on such a short lived
> venture as the Tiger Racing Program instead of something more successful
> such as Shelby's Ford Development or NASCAR where he might have made a more
> historically meaningful and visible contribution.  The combined technical
> contribution of the original old LA Basin Hot Rodders is astounding.
>
> Tom

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>