| To: | DrMayf <drmayf@teknett.com> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: Power to weight ratio (non tiger) |
| From: | Steve Laifman <SLaifman@SoCal.RR.com> |
| Date: | Mon, 20 Aug 2001 11:31:06 -0700 |
I must admit that Mayf has the acceleration formula correct, and that
original statement (wrong on the face of it), does not alter the
relationships I did provide about assumptions. Just listen to old Mayf -
the formulas were wrong, as well.
--
Steve Laifman < Find out what is most >
B9472289 < important in your life >
< and don't let it get away!>
<SLaifman@SoCal.RR.com>
<http://www.TigersUnited.com/gallery/SteveLaifman.asp>
_/_/_/_/_/_/_/
_/ _/_/_/ _/_/_/ _/
_/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/_/_/_/
_/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/
_/_/_/_/_/__/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/
_/
_/_/_/
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: Power to weight ratio (non tiger), DrMayf |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Paint, James Barrett |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Power to weight ratio (non tiger), DrMayf |
| Next by Thread: | Charge it, Scott Minton |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |