No, it was a shell, but the frame was still attached. I was there at the time.
Semantics, not lingo, lad.
Al J.
Chris Hill wrote:
> Look at Paul's website, I think that was a frame off...
> -----Original Message-----
> From: twojohnsons@home.com <twojohnsons@home.com>
> To: Armand & Lorie Ritchie <ritchie@mcn.org>
> Cc: RLingo40@aol.com <RLingo40@aol.com>; tigers@autox.team.net
> <tigers@autox.team.net>
> Date: Wednesday, December 15, 1999 9:30 AM
> Subject: Re: Tiger II
>
> >How do you do a frame-off in a uni-body??/ Hmmmmmm.
> >Al J.
> >
> >Armand & Lorie Ritchie wrote:
> >
> >> >Hello- Does anyone know of a Tiger II for sale....in mint condition and
> >> >completely restored?
> >>
> >> Here's two from "Hemmings Motor New" web site.
> >>
> >> SUNBEAM: 1967 Tiger Mk II, matching number car in very good original
> >> condition, California car stored in heated garage for last 7 years,
> 69,000
> >> original miles, orig paint, orig spare, very good original example,
> $32,000.
> >> PH: 518-891-1723, NY.
> >>
> >> SUNBEAM: 1967 Tiger Mark II, all original, 1,000 miles since frame-off
> >> restoration, always garaged and covered, fact sheet and photo
> available,
> >> asking $30,500. PH: 732-449-0895, NJ.
> >>
> >> ritchie@mcn.org
> >> Armand & Lorie Ritchie
> >
> >
|