Well these were my own opinions, and how "I" would consider the cars. I
wasn't infering how TAC or anyone else should consider the cars. The idea of a
"re-bodied Tiger" hasn't come up that I am aware of. It's common in the MGB
community, but they aren't borrowing parts from a separate car built to be a
separate car model such as the Alpine and Tiger. Obviously buying a rebodied
TAC failing Tiger would be better than buying converted Alger.. Again, this is
MY OPINION.....
Rich
>Again, I can't claim to offer "official" TAC policy, but first off, they
>only consider two categories of car; those that are authenticated and those
>that aren't. No "Re-Bodied Tiger" label, no scarlet "A", etc. for those who
>tried and failed
>>
>> - - - or if some of the secret Jensen welds, or overlaps or
>>whatever are now missing due to the Alpine parts being used extensively, then
>>the Tiger should be considered a Re-Bodied Tiger. If all of the secret parts
>>are intact (in-Tac'ed), then it would be a normal restored Tiger.
>>
>> That's how I would see it. But then again, I'm not a member of TAC, and
>>won't be buying a Tiger anyway...
>>
>>Rich
>>
|