tigers
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Road & Track's Comparing the BMW M3 to a Tiger

To: robhogan@freewwweb.com, tigers@Autox.Team.Net
Subject: Re: Road & Track's Comparing the BMW M3 to a Tiger
From: HW200@aol.com
Date: Sun, 21 Jun 1998 22:53:06 EDT
In a message dated 98-06-21 22:37:26 EDT, robhogan@freewwweb.com writes:

<< Norman C. Miller wrote:
 
 > 
 > The problem is nobody knows about the Sunbeam Tiger.
 
 Precisely the point.  Even if it did not merit the status of a cover
 story, wouldn't a 350+ HP Tiger's published 0-60 MPH and quarter mile
 times gain immediate attention for what these diminutive, 2500 pound
 pocket rockets are capable of?  Particularly when equiped with the
 suspension and tire improvements available today.
 
 My trailer towed, engineless BRG Tiger certainly didn't go without
 frequent notice and comments on my last move from Cadillac, MI to
 Indianapolis.  There is possibly an unknown plethora of admirers out
 there that want to know more about the car in its ENHANCED state.  The
 fact that magazines can't get that image presented is possibly more
 their failure and ours for not devoting the effort to publicize it.  
 (Roll into a Mid-western gas station sometime with a cocophony of the
 11:1 compression and radical valve gear ringing out header tones and the
 results will be tremendously evident on surronding observers' facial
 expressions.  They can't believe anything that small can contain that
 much engine.)
 
 However, there is no denying that money and sales hype talks louder than
 a few owners of old LBCs.  What could develop from coat-tailing on the
 Shelby organization may well depend on what they have to gain from it. 
 This is not to question methods but to ask what if.
 
  >>
Also racing in front of thousands and winning helps to promote the marque, and
the value of all original Tigers and the modified racers, and yes even
rebodied cars. Grass Roots motorsports made that clear for all who read the
article.

Henry

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>