> Ramon:
> Welcome to the fray.
Well, I didn't and don't want to be in "the fray." I just had to counter a
silly suggestion for an abbreviated autocross in favor of an extended
concourse with an equally silly suggestion for a two-day autocross in favor
of an abbreviated concourse.
> One thing you fail to understand is that NO ONE is
> arguing against autocross, particularly at the expense of a concours
event.
I understand your situation. Exactly.
> And by the way, where were you? You and your bride would have cleaned
> everybody's clock on that boorish autocross course.
Thank you, but Theresia and I decided last year that it would be in
everyone's best interest if we just passed on Tigers United from now on.
For us, it started in Tahoe with their chicken-shit rule that you had to
present the car in the concourse with the same wheels/tires you were going
to run in the autocross. I'll not go into any of our displeasure with
Tigers United XX in Grants Pass. Then, when we heard of the plans for more
of the same in Bakersfield last year, we just decided that enough was enough
already. The reports on Eureka only solidify our position.
We wish you all well with the Big Bear event, but it is highly unlikely that
we will be there either.
>Keep the faith...and your sense of humor.
We'd perish without plenty of both!
Ramon
|