To: | tigers@Autox.Team.Net, a-richat@MICROSOFT.com, anitabrt@mindspring.com |
---|---|
Subject: | RE: 351C Tiger II -Reply |
From: | John Crawley <johnc@nait.ab.ca> |
Date: | Wed, 26 Feb 1997 08:16:27 -0700 |
Jim: I often have wondered if boxing in the dog-leg on the front frame of the TIGER would stiffen up the front end. An engineer-type looked over my car and said that this area is the weakest part of design of the car. In fact he said that concidering how the metal is formed in this area it is a wonder that any of them stay together! How much do you attribute this mod to tightening up the front end of your car? |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: 351C, etc., Rick Fedorchak |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re[2]: The quest for more horsepower!, nicholsj |
Previous by Thread: | RE: 351C Tiger II, Richard Atherton (Entex) |
Next by Thread: | CHANGE SUBSRIPTION NAME- 2nd Notice, Bill Cartus |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |