tigers
[Top] [All Lists]

RE: Renault Spin on Filter

To: dondaves@ix.netcom.com (Don Daves), tigers@autox.team.net
Subject: RE: Renault Spin on Filter
From: marrone@wco.com (Frank Marrone)
Date: Thu, 24 Oct 1996 20:34:50 -0700 (PDT)
Don,

So my Ford factory shop manual is wrong then?

>>>What I have heard is the smaller the filter the "sooner" the bypass 
>>>becomes activated.  Even largish (PH8A) filters have their bypass 
>>>open at higher RPM (and viscocity) but smaller filters bypass sooner 
>>>and you end up spending more time without the filter in the circuit.
>
>Ford engines utilize "full-flow" lubrication.  Which means all oil must 
>pass through the filter before it gets into the engine.  The pressure 
>relief valve dumps excess oil back to the pan before it reaches the 
>filter.  As for the size of the filter - though it may not have the 
>debris-holding capacity of a PH8a, FL1, etc., it shouldn't be a problem 
>with oil flow.  
>
>By comparison, my 86' Jeep with a 360 V8 uses a Fram 3675 - it's about 
>the smallest filter I've ever seen.  I too had concerns about its' 
>ability to perform, but, I figure the manufacturer knew what they were 
>doing and, with over 140,000 miles, the motor is still running strong.
>Just my 2 cents...
>
>Don Daves      <dondaves@ix.netcom.com>
>Santa Cruz, CA.
>65 Tiger (his)
>64 1/2 Mustang conv (hers)
>
>
>
>
>
Frank Marrone          MK I Tiger B9471116
marrone@wco.com        1966 LTD 
                       Series I Alpine  (2.3L powered by Ford)
                       Yamaha Seca 900


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>