I don't have a problem with his comment.All of us including classic car
owners have a duty to keep our cars in top condition. The liberal view
of ignorant government agencies writing legislation that mandates
regulations that are asinine is the problem.Example requiring autos in
California to have all original pieces to pass smog check ,the idea
should be to meet the emission level. I have a friend that had to take
off his fuel injection on a Pantera and search like heck for an
original(not manufactured for 15 years manifold and carb.) There is an
obvious need to get rid of the polluters .There is no excuse to let
someone drive a belching beater just because it is a classic.Look at
this liberal take no responsibility C.A.R.B. mandating oxygenated fuel
and not warning of the danger of fuel system damage and the outright lie
of little impact on fuel milage.
On Thu, 10 Oct 1996 09:45:11 -0400 C5813@aol.com writes:
> In case you missed the debate last night...
>=====================================================
>Mr. Kemp: Well, we have to have the type of economic prosperity that
>will
>allow us to generate the revenues to provide this technology. Ten
>percent
>of all the emissions - 10% of all the hydrocarbon emissions, oxides
>going
>into the air are cause by just 10% - 100% of all the emissions are
>caused
>by 10% of the automobiles. Now, there is technology that would allow
>infrared technology to be used to identify those cars that are
>providing
>all the pollution in our atmosphere. It is not being able to be used
>because we are going to take every automobile driver in America, all
>110
>million automobiles and charge them 17 or 20 or $25. Look, we ought to
>go
>after the ones that pollute, not go after the men and women who want
>to be
>able to drive their automobile to work or to school and to make sure
>that
>they have the type of opportunity to live like everyone else without
>having
>themselves regulated by a Washington establishment.
>=====================================================
> What about who want to be able to drive their classic car "to work
>or to
>school and to make sure that they have the type of opportunity to live
>like
>everyone else without having themselves regulated by a Washington
>establishment"??
>
|