tigers
[Top] [All Lists]

RE: NOS vs REPRO

To: "'tigers'" <tigers@autox.team.net>,
Subject: RE: NOS vs REPRO
From: "Richard Atherton (Entex)" <a-richat@MICROSOFT.com>
Date: Tue, 23 Jul 1996 03:26:11 -0700
        Have I just completely lost my mind?  I thought that Carol Shelby was
already dead.  I remember reading about his death about two or three
years ago.  There was even a TV special I saw about him, which by the
way, only mention the Tiger in passing.  I thought for sure he was
already dead.


Rich


>----------
>From:  Les McClelland, x4526[SMTP:LESM@uvsg.com]
>Sent:  Thursday, July 18, 1996 12:49 PM
>To:    tigers
>Subject:       RE: NOS vs REPRO
>
>
>As a non-purist Tiger owner what I am concerned with is keeping the beast on
>the road.  There currently is very little collector interest in Tigers as
>indicated by the current declining value of these cars (over the past 5
>years), and probably won't be until Shelby dies.  So the bottom line is if
>you had to choose between driving a Tiger with repro parts or letting it sit
>in the garage waiting for some rare part what would you choose?  It is much
>more fun to drive one than look at it.
>
>Les McClelland - Tulsa, OK
>Lesm@prevuenet.com
>
> ----------
>
>>While I don't necessarily want to come down on Frank's side here, I'm
>>wondering if is it reasonable to be comparing perishables like gasoline,
>>oil, tires or even rubber parts to a "non perishable" item like an air
>>cleaner or a rare coin?  I don't think Frank would even argue that only
>>a period OEM air filters should be used inside the air cleaner unless it
>>is clearly marked non original.
>
>>Roland
>

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>