To: | tigers@autox.team.net, richard.fedorchak@gsfc.nasa.gov, |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: Yawn ?? |
From: | Keith Bradshaw <bradshaw@utdallas.edu> |
Date: | Wed, 26 Jun 1996 14:17:39 -0500 |
All; -Wasn't there a 6-rotor Wankel in a Mercedes? Mercedes built some 3 and 4 rotor C111 sports cars in the 70's that went 180-190 mph. in the '30's or '40's that held some "massive" land-speed & closed course records? In the 30's they used straight 8 formula 1 engines and one giant car that never really ran (model 80) that had a ME-109 engine. In the 70's they built an ultimate streamliner went 200 for 24 hours using 14 mpg using a turbo diesel. They then put a twin turbo 7 litre v8 in and got 268 mph. Why not just put in a ram-jet? Need to go to 300-400 mph to start a ram-jet. Pulse-jet would be better or old cheap turbbine. What about solid propellants? They have great power-to-weight characteristics. They'll keep tailgating to a minimum in every automotive event you compete in after the swap. Used in the "Blue Flame " to set the world speed record...Sidewinder rocket however the rocket bulged into the cockpit so never run again. mBrad |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | The General, 215's, the Corvair, and Sunbeams, Rick Fedorchak |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re[4]: New Thread (was REALLY, REALLY SMALL...), LeBrun |
Previous by Thread: | Yawn ??, Rick Fedorchak |
Next by Thread: | Re: Yawn ??, LeBrun |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |