| To: | tigers@autox.team.net, richard.fedorchak@gsfc.nasa.gov, |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: Yawn ?? |
| From: | Keith Bradshaw <bradshaw@utdallas.edu> |
| Date: | Wed, 26 Jun 1996 14:17:39 -0500 |
All;
-Wasn't there a 6-rotor Wankel in a Mercedes?
Mercedes built some 3 and 4 rotor C111 sports cars in the 70's
that went 180-190 mph.
in the '30's or '40's
that held some "massive" land-speed & closed course records?
In the 30's they used straight 8 formula 1 engines and one giant car that
never really ran (model 80) that had a ME-109 engine.
In the 70's they built an ultimate streamliner went 200 for 24 hours
using 14 mpg using a turbo diesel.
They then put a twin turbo 7 litre v8 in and got 268 mph.
Why not just put in a ram-jet?
Need to go to 300-400 mph to start a ram-jet.
Pulse-jet would be better or old cheap turbbine.
What about solid propellants? They have
great power-to-weight characteristics. They'll keep tailgating to
a
minimum in every automotive event you compete in after the swap.
Used in the "Blue Flame " to set the world speed record...Sidewinder rocket
however the rocket bulged into the cockpit so never run again.
mBrad
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | The General, 215's, the Corvair, and Sunbeams, Rick Fedorchak |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re[4]: New Thread (was REALLY, REALLY SMALL...), LeBrun |
| Previous by Thread: | Yawn ??, Rick Fedorchak |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Yawn ??, LeBrun |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |