spridgets
[Top] [All Lists]

[Spridgets] Not LBC......... Nova link to awesome Quantum Mechanics

Subject: [Spridgets] Not LBC......... Nova link to awesome Quantum Mechanics
From: bmwwxman at gmail.com (Jim Johnson)
Date: Mon, 21 Nov 2011 13:18:45 -0600
References: <CABWjhcLWvRMfCm3LNXVHGjpq7F9pBH6Crh8UybRH2-NmhRrQvw@mail.gmail.com> <698770C0069D4703A55E3F6EBF79B809@Home> <CAJgjnurr4VsxMdJPdiY4fGEuh5-Meb9VB9XtHfkN7QVRsogGqA@mail.gmail.com> <D3D6F2AAF39A4B01B8A4E2830A2800C7@Home>
I would be interested in hearing what you learn next time.  Off list, of
course....

Cheers!!
Jim

P.S.  How's Kai?

On Mon, Nov 21, 2011 at 12:26 PM, Michael Rowe <mdrowe at optonline.net> wrote:

> **
> My very limited understanding of string theory is that it has so many
> degrees of freedom that it can fit pretty much anything.  It also  means
> that there is no way to test anything, since it can produce any desired
> result more or less arbitrarily.
>
> I used to work near (not with) these guys.  I had dinner with one on
> Saturday.  Next time I will ask him.  I am much intrigued by the recent
> results on faster-than-light travel, the missing Higgs boson, and the
> implications for the Standard Model.  These two results could have a
> profound impact on our ideas about reality.
>
> Michael Rowe
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> *From:* Jim Johnson <bmwwxman at gmail.com>
> *To:* Michael Rowe <mdrowe at optonline.net>
> *Cc:* rbastedo at gmail.com ; spridgets at autox.team.net
> *Sent:* Monday, November 21, 2011 12:26 PM
> *Subject:* Re: [Spridgets] Not LBC......... Nova link to awesome Quantum
> Mechanics
>
> Agreed, Michael. Some of the latest thoughts in the "String Theory"
> revival are now leaning in that direction too.  Anyone know if the math has
> gotten that far yet?
>
> Cheers!!
> Jim
>
> On Mon, Nov 21, 2011 at 11:20 AM, Michael Rowe <mdrowe at optonline.net>wrote:
>
>> Particles that pop in and out of existance, are more likely popping in
>> and out of another dimension(s) that we have not yet figured out.  That
>> could also explain the probabilistic behavior.  We don't know what happens
>> to them when they are out of our dimensions, but it is clearly systematic
>> as shown by their predictability.
>>
>> Michael Rowe ______________________________**_________________
>>
>>
>> Donate: http://www.team.net/donate.**html<http://www.team.net/donate.html>
>> Suggested annual donation  $12.75
>> Archive: http://www.team.net/archive
>> Forums: http://www.team.net/forums
>> Unsubscribe/Manage: http://autox.team.net/mailman/**
>> options/spridgets/bmwwxman@**gmail.com<http://autox.team.net/mailman/options/spridgets/bmwwxman
>>  at gmail.com>
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> Cheers!!
> Jim Johnson
> Sprite-Midget Club USA <http://www.Sprite-MidgetClub.org>
> High Plains Youth Hockey <http://www.highplainsyouthhockey.org>
> Dodge City Trail of Fame <http://www.DodgeCityTrailofFame.org>
> Electronic Journal of Severe Storms Meteorology <http://www.EJSSM.org>
> Yup.  I stay plenty busy!!
> bmwwxman at gmail.com
>
>


-- 
Cheers!!
Jim Johnson
Sprite-Midget Club USA <http://www.Sprite-MidgetClub.org>
High Plains Youth Hockey <http://www.highplainsyouthhockey.org>
Dodge City Trail of Fame <http://www.DodgeCityTrailofFame.org>
Electronic Journal of Severe Storms Meteorology <http://www.EJSSM.org>
Yup.  I stay plenty busy!!
bmwwxman at gmail.com

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>