spridgets
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: 3.9 rear

To: Walt & Zoe Harrison <wzharrison@comcast.net>, Bill L
Subject: Re: 3.9 rear
From: Mike/Donna Carpenter <mail4carpenters@peoplepc.com>
Date: Tue, 15 May 2007 07:41:21 -0400 (EDT)
There is really not enough of a difference between the 4.2 and the 3.9 
differentials to warrant swapping out.  Spridgets are so great on gas anyway, I 
doubt that you would even notice a monetary savings.  The 4.22 is way more fun 
and actually the 4.55 and 4.88 are even greater fun!

Mike C

-----Original Message-----
>From: Walt & Zoe Harrison <wzharrison@comcast.net>
>Sent: May 15, 2007 12:36 AM
>To: Bill L <pythias@pacifier.com>, spridgets@autox.team.net
>Subject: Re: 3.9 rear
>
>Bill,
>
>Here's my two-cents ... the 3.9:1 ratio rear end is quite nice with a Sprite 
>1275cc
>engine and 4-speed web-case tranny.  We've had one for years.
>
>It bolts right up to your existing rear-end and drive shalf, no major 
>changes involved.
>It gives you higher cruising speed with less RPM, and better gas mileage. 
>It pulls just
>fine from a start, not quite as quick as a 4.22:1, but then it seems we're 
>shifting into
>second almost immediately anyway, so this may be a nit.  I like the better 
>range you
>have in second and third.  Mileage-wise, our Sprite averages 30+ MPG running
>premium.  The down-side?  We cannot cruise 70+ MPH on the interstate for 
>hours,
>but then that's no fun to start with, and we try to avoid it. As for 
>justifying the expense,
>amoritize the cost over 40-60K miles, not 4K.
>
>FWIW, Walt
>
>----- Original Message ----- 
>From: "Bill L" <pythias@pacifier.com>
>To: <spridgets@autox.team.net>
>Sent: Monday, May 14, 2007 4:26 PM
>Subject: Re: 3.9 rear
>
>
>Hello ,
>
>       Thanx to all who replied offering 3.9 rear ends for my trip to
>       Mo.... interestingly enough, after running some numbers i'm
>       not sure the conversion makes economic sense... the going rate
>       (as defined by sales on ebay) seems to be somewhere between
>       $125 and $200 not counting shipping.... now, if the change in
>       gearing of ~7% results in direct savings of the same amount i
>       could expect to save a TOTAL of about $35 to $40 over the 4000
>       mile trip (at $4/gal)... .. hmmmm... .....
>
>       have to justify the expense some other way..   :-)
>
>       anyone else running a 1098 with a 5 speed and a 3.9 rear end? a
>       3.7?   how is the power as compared to the 4.22? (assuming that
>       you HAD a 4.22 and changed).. overall mileage?  snap off the
>       line?  freeway cruising.. .. ???
>
>       ?????????????????????????????????????????
>
>
>
>
>-- 
>Best regards,
> Bill                            mailto:pythias@pacifier.com
>
>

________________________________________
PeoplePC Online
A better way to Internet
http://www.peoplepc.com




<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>