the SU Vs. weber thing is quite like the GM crowd arguing over holly Vs.
rochester carbs! the rochester and the SU are wonderfull carbs but
require quite a bit of work to get to function well above their stock
delivered condition. while the weber and the holley carbs are easily tuned
by their interchangeability of parts and infinite adjustments.
my set of SU's are just as deadly as my trick weber side draft! i prefer
the SU's as most refuse they work well at all untill someone drives my car!
the shock value is priceless!
other than the new vintage velocity stacks and the longman header my car
looks rather "stock" under the hood.
chuck. :)
-----Original Message-----
From Robert E. Shlafer <PilotRob at webtv.net>
To: Geoff Branch <gjbranch@attbi.com>
Cc: spridgets@autox.team.net <spridgets@autox.team.net>
Date: Wednesday, June 25, 2003 8:02 AM
Subject: Re: SU question
>Yes, Geoff...
>
>Boring out the jet(s) would definitley
>enrichen the mixture throughout the
>entire rpm range, no doubt about it.
>
>Going back to stock "90" jets should make
>quite a difference.
>
>ON the "45"...just curious:
>Was the calibration (especially choke
/// unsubscribe/change address requests to majordomo@autox.team.net or try
/// http://www.team.net/mailman/listinfo
/// Archives at http://www.team.net/archive/spridgets
|