Well, Pixel....yes, I AM curious!
But, as you may recall, I replaced the little
stock 1098 with the Rivergate (Judson
"tailored") 1293; there was really nothing
wrong with the stock 1098.
But, I might not want to save it were it
the "CG" motor. The stronger "CC" is
another story....I can put the blower on
this motor if need be so it's worth
(in time) replacing bearings, oil pump, etc., and keeping as a "spare".
Think we'll do it over this coming winter
when mechanic gets "slow" and has some
spare time on his hands and I can get
involved as well.
Cap'n. Bob
'60 :{)
Received: from smtpin-2115.public.lawson.webtv.net (209.240.213.125) by
storefull-2174.public.lawson.webtv.net with WTV-SMTP; Wed, 19 Jun 2002
22:08:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from sm0101.promedia.net (sm0101.promedia.net [208.131.40.4])
by smtpin-2115.public.lawson.webtv.net (WebTV_Postfix+sws) with ESMTP
id 527CFFE22 for <PilotRob@webtv.net>; Wed, 19 Jun 2002 22:08:54 -0700
(PDT)
Received: from [209.209.93.34] (ppp-209-209-93-48.16.softcom.net
[209.209.93.48]) by sm0101.promedia.net (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id
g5K58qx01061; Wed, 19 Jun 2002 22:08:53 -0700
>
References: Gerard <pixelsmith@gerardsgarage.com>'s message of Wed, 19
Jun 2002 21:27:52 -0700
Date: Wed, 19 Jun 2002 22:08:31 -0700
To: PilotRob@webtv.net (Robert E. Shlafer)
From Gerard <pixelsmith at gerardsgarage.com>
Subject: Re: 1098 engine....CC or CG?
Cc: Pasgeirsson@worldnet.att.net (Paul A. Asgeirsson),
spridgets@autox.team.net
Why open it if it runs so good... is the curiousity that bad?
Gerard
At 12:59 AM -0400 6/20/02, Robert E. Shlafer wrote:
>Exactly so, Gerard.....
>
>Thanks anyway, Paul, but it just looks like
>I'm gonna have to open it up and find out!!
>
>So be it....darn thing runs so damn well
>I just can't throw it away. Well worth having around as a spare but
>especially
>so if it's a "CC".
>
>My new 1293 runs pretty smoothly and
>produces far more serious "vibrations",
>even at 8.3-1 but, nothing matches the
>silky smoothness of the little 1098 it
>replaced.
>
>
>
>
>Cap'n. Bob
> '60 :{)
>
>
>Received: from smtpin-2202.public.lawson.webtv.net (209.240.213.132) by
> storefull-2176.public.lawson.webtv.net with WTV-SMTP; Wed, 19 Jun
> 2002 21:48:38 -0700 (PDT)
>Received: from sm0101.promedia.net (sm0101.promedia.net [208.131.40.4]) by
> smtpin-2202.public.lawson.webtv.net (WebTV_Postfix+sws) with ESMTP
> id B91CDFE20 for <PilotRob@webtv.net>; Wed, 19 Jun 2002 21:48:37
> -0700 (PDT)
>Received: from [209.209.93.34] (ppp-209-209-93-48.16.softcom.net
> [209.209.93.48]) by sm0101.promedia.net (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP
> id g5K4mZx30978; Wed, 19 Jun 2002 21:48:35 -0700
>X-Sender: gdg-pxlsmith@pop.softcom.net
>Message-Id: <v03130332b937097e541d@[209.209.93.34]>
>In-Reply-To: <3D114C87.90CADD58@worldnet.att.net>
>References: Gerard <pixelsmith@gerardsgarage.com>'s message of Wed, 19
> Jun 2002 09:04:11 -0700 <v0313032db936ca1bff84@[209.209.93.34]>
>Mime-Version: 1.0
>Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
>Date: Wed, 19 Jun 2002 21:27:52 -0700
>To: "Paul A. Asgeirsson" <Pasgeirsson@worldnet.att.net>
>From: Gerard <pixelsmith@gerardsgarage.com>
>Subject: Re: 1098 engine....CC or CG?
>Cc: "Robert E. Shlafer" <PilotRob@webtv.net>, spridgets@autox.team.net
>
>We knew that Paul, the question is how can you tell if it's one or the
>other if the serial # plate is missing and you don't want to drop the pan.
>Bob was asking me if you can tell by the casting number on the block.
>
>Gerard
>
>At 8:31 PM -0700 6/19/02, Paul A. Asgeirsson wrote:
>>The 10CC is the 2" main engine, the 10CG is the 1 3/4" main one.
>>
>>Paul A
>>
>>Gerard wrote:
>>
>>> Don't know offhand. I have a 10CC block around but not a 10CG so I can't
>>> compare if the numbers are same of different.
>>>
>>> Paul Asgeirsson will probably know.
>>>
>>> Gerard
>>>
>>> At 2:33 PM -0400 6/19/02, Robert E. Shlafer wrote:
>>> >"Pixelperson"
>>> >
>>> >I wonder if you might be able to help me
>>> >out?
>>> >
>>> >The 1098 engine I pulled and replaced with my Rivergate 1293 has the
>>> >following
>>> >number on the left, middle, rear of the block:
>>> > 12G432
>>> >
>>> >Is there any way this number can be used
>>> >to find out whether the engine is the "small main" or "large main" 1098
>>> >as
>>> >unfortunately, the engine came without
>>> >it's identification "plate".
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >Cap'n. Bob
>>> > '60 :{)
/// unsubscribe/change address requests to majordomo@autox.team.net or try
/// http://www.team.net/mailman/listinfo
/// Archives at http://www.team.net/archive/spridgets
|