You hitthe nail on the head "As long as the gun is used properly and the
child has proper supervision" -- Instead of providing proper instruction to
the child and instead of providing supervision for the child, the common
philosophy today is "take it away from all". "If my child had not had your
dangerous weapon, he/she would never has been put in the position to need to
be supervised, therefore, Daisy it is your fault my child shots other kids
with your dangerous weapon." "PS and by the way I am sueing you for my pain
and mental anguish."
----- Original Message -----
From <BritishCarMan at aol.com>
To: <RBHouston@aol.com>; <spridgets@autox.team.net>
Sent: Friday, January 11, 2002 9:46 PM
Subject: Re: meowwwwwch
> Why put Daisy out of business? It's a bb gun for crying out loud. I still
> have my Daisy gun from when I was a child. It must be around 15 years old
by
> now and still works. As long as the gun is used properly and the child has
> proper supervision then I would think there would be little to no danger
of
> injury. However, as we all know, when the child is unsupervised then all
> kinds of things can happen. This may be a controversial subject for some
but
> this is my own opinion. Then again I was raised in a family that values
guns.
>
> Jamie
> 1962 Austin Healey Sprite MK II
> 1979 Pontiac Trans Am WS6
> Web site: <A
HREF="http://www.angelfire.com/fl2/darkside/mycar.html";>Welcome to my
british car site</A>
>
> In a message dated 1/11/02 11:37:45 AM Central Standard Time,
> RBHouston@aol.com writes:
>
>
> > Think Daisey...and think quick as the gun haters are trying to put them
out
> > of business.
/// unsubscribe/change address requests to majordomo@autox.team.net or try
/// http://www.team.net/mailman/listinfo
/// Archives at http://www.team.net/archive/spridgets
|