To: | PilotRob@webtv.net (Robert E. Shlafer), clabaw@jpl.nasa.gov (Clayton La Baw) |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: Tube Shock Conversion? - definitive comparison |
Date: | Thu, 16 Aug 2001 09:32:18 -0700 |
Cc: | mikeg@vicnet.net.au (Mike & Kerry Gigante), type79@ix.netcom.com, spridgets@autox.team.net |
References: | <Clayton La Baw <clabaw@jpl.nasa.gov> |
Bob - Follow-up to earlier: I started with the tubes set to zero, and dialed them up until I could negotiate my "test section" (a severe diagonal dip in the I-210 freeway that provokes the dreaded "Austin wriggle" in stock lever suspensions) without "sashay". Ended up at level 7 as softest acceptable. A Watts link (in the future) should allow a softer setting. Clay L. '67 Sprite >Clay- > >Happy with rear "Spax" ride under normal >road driving (assuming you also use car >in this fashion?), or too stiff, or---------? > > > > >Cap'n. Bob > '61 :{) |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: Soft topsx-mac-creator="4D4F5353" 2001 07:27:49 -0500, Unknown |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: Tube Shock Conversion? ( wierd ) of Thu, 16 Aug 2001 07:01:35 -0400, Unknown |
Previous by Thread: | Re: Tube Shock Conversion? - definitive comparison, Unknown |
Next by Thread: | Re: Tube Shock Conversion? - definitive comparison, Unknown |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |