spridgets
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Re those BMC crank part numbers

To: "spridgets" <spridgets@autox.team.net>
Subject: Re: Re those BMC crank part numbers
Date: Wed, 3 May 2000 09:36:48 +0100charset="iso-8859-1"
References: <000901bfb28f$12ef3fc0$0321893e@pbncomputer>
----- Original Message -----
From rob thomas <rob at thomasr.greatxscape.net>
To: spridgets <spridgets@autox.team.net>
Sent: 30 April 2000 11:29
Subject: Re those BMC crank part numbers

"If you cannot see anything that is obviously wrong, you are most probably
missing something obvious"
(Sherlock Holmes quote?)

No luck yet on identifying that odd-ball crankshaft but took a second look
with a dial gauge.  Remeasured the big-end bearings and they were all approx
1.7500 inch.  Got the Haynes manual out to check the tolerances and
discovered that they should be 1.6250 inch.
A-haaaaaa!!!
Big big-ends!!!!
That explains why the rods are filed down to (not quite) fit the 1275 block.



<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
  • Re: Re those BMC crank part numbers, Unknown <=