Hello Mike,
I'll pay the appropriate forfeit, but I don't think he did - just one of
the bridges. Let me know when you have completed your search. OK now, who
has a suggestion for 'appropriate forfeit' if I'm wrong?
Elizabeth
At 09:39 PM 1/19/00 -0000, Graziano, Michael wrote:
>Actually, I think he did buy _THE_ London Bridge. The one most people
>assume to be the London Bridge is actually called the Tower Bridge (which is
>still there) , and is located just ouside the Tower Of London over the River
>Thames. I need to check with a few Brit friends to be sure, though. Maybe
>a web search.......
>
>Mike
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Albert F Jones [SMTP:fisher@hctc.net]
>> Sent: Wednesday, January 19, 2000 4:35 PM
>> To: Graziano, Michael; Peter C.; spridgets@autox.team.net
>> Subject: RE: High beam dip switch XLBC
>>
>> Hello Mike,
>>
>> I thought the person who bought 'one' of the London bridges (NOT
>> _THE_
>> London Bridge) was in Arizona. No matter, the answer is still the same -
>> no. This is just another eccentric Texan who wanted his own copy of
>> Stonehenge. I can say that, being married to another eccentric Texan -
>> right Robert?
>>
>> Elizabeth
>>
>> At 04:23 PM 1/19/00 -0500, Graziano, Michael wrote:
>> >I take it this isn't the same gentleman who bought, dismantled, and
>> >reconstructed in Texas the London Bridge, and who attempted to purchase
>> the
>> >Eiffel Tower.
>> >
>> >Or is it?
>> >
>> >Mike
>> >
>> >> -----Original Message-----
>> >> From: Albert F Jones [SMTP:fisher@hctc.net]
>> >> Sent: Wednesday, January 19, 2000 3:54 PM
>> >> To: Peter C.; spridgets@autox.team.net
>> >> Subject: Re: High beam dip switch XLBC
>> >>
>> >> Peter,
>> >>
>> >> I have to admit that, apart from some sort of ball game, I have no
>> >> idea
>> >> what the Dallas Cowboys play ........Armed and ready for any and all
>> >> flames.........just send them right on.
>> >>
>> >> But seriously, there really is a copy of Stonehenge here. Someone
>> >> decided
>> >> to build it for himself, and then decided to let all the rubberneckers
>> >> onto
>> >> his land to take a closer look. Fisher thinks itis neat, I won't tell
>> you
>> >> what I think about it.
>> >>
>> >> Elizabeth
>> >>
>> >> At 02:26 PM 1/19/00 -0600, Peter C. wrote:
>> >> >At 02:05 PM 1/19/2000 , Albert F Jones wrote:
>> >> >(actually Elizabeth)
>> >> >>did y'all (Texan content) know that we have a Texas version
>> >> >>of Stonehenge just a few miles from Kerrville?
>> >> >
>> >> >..... Dallas Cowboys Stadium?
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> >Peter C
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >
>> >This message is for the named person's use only. It may contain
>> >confidential, proprietary or legally privileged information. No
>> >confidentiality or privilege is waived or lost by any mistransmission.
>> >If you receive this message in error, please immediately delete it and
>> all
>> >copies of it from your system, destroy any hard copies of it and notify
>> the
>> >sender. You must not, directly or indirectly, use, disclose, distribute,
>>
>> >print, or copy any part of this message if you are not the intended
>> >recipient. CREDIT SUISSE GROUP, CREDIT SUISSE FIRST BOSTON, and each of
>> >their subsidiaries each reserve the right to monitor all e-mail
>> >communications through its networks. Any views expressed in this message
>> >are those of the individual sender, except where the message states
>> >otherwise and the sender is authorised to state them to be the views of
>> >any such entity.
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>
>This message is for the named person's use only. It may contain
>confidential, proprietary or legally privileged information. No
>confidentiality or privilege is waived or lost by any mistransmission.
>If you receive this message in error, please immediately delete it and all
>copies of it from your system, destroy any hard copies of it and notify the
>sender. You must not, directly or indirectly, use, disclose, distribute,
>print, or copy any part of this message if you are not the intended
>recipient. CREDIT SUISSE GROUP, CREDIT SUISSE FIRST BOSTON, and each of
>their subsidiaries each reserve the right to monitor all e-mail
>communications through its networks. Any views expressed in this message
>are those of the individual sender, except where the message states
>otherwise and the sender is authorised to state them to be the views of
>any such entity.
>
>
>
>
>
|