To: | <Lancer7676@aol.com>, <cdsorkin@ix.netcom.com>, <spridgets@autox.team.net> |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: Timing vs. cooling efficiency |
From: | "Mike Gigante" <mikeg@vicnet.net.au> |
Date: | Sat, 6 Nov 1999 09:16:32 +1100 |
References: | <0.52968b6d.2554a920@aol.com> |
Reply-to: | "Mike Gigante" <mikeg@vicnet.net.au> |
Sender: | owner-spridgets@autox.team.net |
Too much advance will cause detonation (pining, pinging). Overheating in traffic is more likely not enough advance (timing is too far retarded) Mike ----- Original Message ----- From: <Lancer7676@aol.com> To: <cdsorkin@ix.netcom.com>; <spridgets@autox.team.net> Sent: Saturday, 6 November 1999 8:41 Subject: Re: Timing vs. cooling efficiency > In a message dated 11/5/99 3:31:46 PM Eastern Standard Time, > cdsorkin@ix.netcom.com writes: > > << I was wondering if > perhaps poorly set timing could be responsible for interfereing with the > cooling efficiency. >> > > Absolutely, Charles. According to my main resource person, if you set the > timng too far advanced your engine will overheat. > > --DAvid C. > |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: Off Topic -- Static Electricity, Steve Byers |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: king pin play (oh no, not another king pin thread!), Mike Gigante |
Previous by Thread: | Re: Timing vs. cooling efficiency, Lancer7676 |
Next by Thread: | Re: Timing vs. cooling efficiency, RBHouston |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |