| To: | "'Mike Gigante'" <mikeg@vicnet.net.au> | 
|---|---|
| Subject: | RE: Radiator Stuff | 
| From: | "Elliott, Patrick" <PElliott@attws-wr.swest.attws.com> | 
| Date: | Tue, 8 Dec 1998 16:09:19 -0800 | 
| Cc: | "spridgets@Autox.Team.Net" <spridgets@Autox.Team.Net> | 
| Reply-to: | "Elliott, Patrick" <PElliott@attws-wr.swest.attws.com> | 
| Sender: | owner-spridgets@Autox.Team.Net | 
        >"Or we could end up with some calculus to describe theoretical
        >performance. Some might remember this *did* happen once
        >when the discussion was about thermostat removal and whether
        >faster flow was better than slower flow."
        >Mike"
This would be a good time for an archive.
Mike Said:
>" Since the factory changed over to the crossflow for later models,
presumably they
> thought there'd be some improvement."
Not necessarily true. probably easier and cheaper to produce and fit
crossflows. A downflow has a few more parts and looks more complex to make. 
 | 
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> | 
|---|---|---|
  | ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: Radiator Stuff, Mike Gigante | 
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Radiator Stuff, Ron Soave | 
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Radiator Stuff, Mike Gigante | 
| Next by Thread: | Re: Radiator Stuff, Ron Soave | 
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |