| To: | AHSprite78@aol.com | 
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: Octane ratings | 
| From: | Ulix Goettsch <ulix@u.washington.edu> | 
| Date: | Thu, 22 Oct 1998 21:08:32 -0700 (PDT) | 
| Cc: | spridgets@Autox.Team.Net | 
| In-reply-to: | <1419a1c4.362fde19@aol.com> | 
| Reply-to: | Ulix Goettsch <ulix@u.washington.edu> | 
| Sender: | owner-spridgets@Autox.Team.Net | 
Matthew,
I would try the cheapest stuff first if your engine is stock.  If it pings
get higher octane.  I run Super because my engine pings with lower grade.
My engine is old and worn, carbon deposits and oil blowby lead to pinging.
Ulix
On Thu, 22 Oct 1998 AHSprite78@aol.com wrote:
> As my 2 year restoration comes to an end I was leafing through one of the many
> manuals that I have and noticed that they recomended the use of 100+ octane
> gas in performance engines and 94 octane for normal engines.  What does
> everyone on the list run?  Is the manual correct?
> 
> Matthew Smith 
> '67 Sprite
> 
    Ulix                                                    __/__,__        
.......................................................... (_o____o_)....
                                                           '67 Sprite
 | 
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> | 
|---|---|---|
  | ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: storage suggestions, Amy Turner | 
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Issue # 10 of PDLJMPR, Ulix Goettsch | 
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Octane ratings, Frank Clarici | 
| Next by Thread: | Re: Octane ratings, Trevor Boicey | 
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |