spridgets
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Lowered '79

To: Spridget List <spridgets@Autox.Team.Net>
Subject: Re: Lowered '79
From: Jeff Sharpe <jsharpe@501studios.com>
Date: Thu, 12 Feb 1998 16:56:47 -0500
Reply-to: Jeff Sharpe <jsharpe@501studios.com>
Sender: owner-spridgets@Autox.Team.Net
----------
> From: Ulix Goettsch <ulix@u.washington.edu> 
> To: Jeff Sharpe <jsharpe@501studios.com> 
> Subject: Re: Lowered '79 
> Date: Thu, 12 Feb 1998 14:19:47 -0800 (PST)
> 
>Jeff,
>which springs did you use?  How do you like them?

They are Moss #264-615.  Only been on the car a day, but other than the
scraping, I like the way they're holding the road.  Of course, the car is
very unstable with the rear spring situation.  

>What do they scrape on?

The fenders, during moderate turns even at low speed.
>
>
>I recommend stock springs with lowering blocks.
>- more flexibility in terms of changing ride height
>- probably cheaper
>- lower springs might be stiffer which I wouldn't want in the rear even
>  though it would create nice oversteer 
>- no problems when installing tube shocks (lowered springs might require
>  shorter shocks)
>
>Lowering the rear would help much for the front, I think, if your tires
>are scraping on the fender.  Are you using oversized tires?

That's a good question.  Right now I have 155/R13's all around.  Maybe 145's
would be more appropriate.  Great feedback about the lowering blocks -
Thanks!


>
>    Ulix                                                    __/__,__       

>.......................................................... (_o____o_)....
>                                                           '67 Sprite
>



<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>