spitfires
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [Spits] Electronic Tach

To: Spitfire list <spitfires@autox.team.net>, Triumph List <triumphs@autox.team.net>
Subject: Re: [Spits] Electronic Tach
From: Roger Elliott <elliottr@rmi.net>
Date: Mon, 07 Jan 2013 18:29:33 -0600
Delivered-to: mharc@autox.team.net
Delivered-to: spitfires@autox.team.net
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=dk20050327; d=rmi.net; b=WEyCu1eAaIh0bvgP0/LXWDWxnU5QfyA+bKla1VEuAsZ4jcU6MkUmc31gR1mrAdDv; h=Received:Message-ID:Date:From:User-Agent:MIME-Version:To:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:Content-Type:X-Antivirus-Status:X-ELNK-Trace:X-Originating-IP;
References: <50E9F737.2030806@rmi.net> <7019B85324FC492CA568857ACC2DF296@MainPC> <1357553775.2934.YahooMailNeo@web171902.mail.ir2.yahoo.com>
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:14.0) Gecko/20120713 Thunderbird/14.0
Thanks Everyone!

The consensus is that it is normal or at least not unusual, as I 
suspected.  I haven't worried about it, because it always starts up 
rather soon. But I was curious if it was just mine.

Thanks,
Roger


On 1/7/2013 4:16 AM, John Macartney wrote:
> This condition is well-known on the eastern side of the pond and in 
> Standard-Triumph parlance of the day comes into the category of "an 
> i'erent (inherent) fault" I've encountered this condition on many 
> later Spitfires, including one that was under my care for some 18 
> months. A firm knock on the instrument glass is all that's required to 
> make it work. One surely doesn't expect the rev counter to work well 
> for ever, does one?
> Jonmac*From:* Grant Buss <buss3@rogers.com>
> **
> Hello
> I have a '78 Spitfire and the tack has been the same way for as long 
> as I have had it (close to 20 years).
> Now idea why.
> Grant Buss
_______________________________________________

Spitfires@autox.team.net
Archive: http://www.team.net/archive

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>