spitfires
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: 69 and 72 1296cc comparability

To: spitfires@autox.team.net
Subject: Re: 69 and 72 1296cc comparability
From: Barry Schwartz <bschwart@pacbell.net>
Date: Fri, 07 Sep 2001 14:38:35 -0700
******forwarded to the list at the request of Keith Burns***************
Is there any difference between a 72 and a 69
>1296 cc engine? Would the parts interchange between the two so the best
>parts of each could be combined to make one?  Actually the marriage of the
>two can be beneficial the 69 bottom end is superior revving with the
>smaller crank journals. The Top of the 72 is higher compression. Also the
>little aluminum block over the crankshaft in the 72 can be put on the 69
>and it has three screws instead of one so that it does not leak as easily.
>I just combined the two and am very happy with the results. But you do not
>need to take my word for it check out this article.  

///  spitfires@autox.team.net mailing list
///  or try  http://www.team.net/cgi-bin/majorcool


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>