I'll second that. I would never jeopardize my paint job by going back to the
"dark" ages fluif. Silicone or bust!
Vic Whitmore
76 Spitfire
Thornhill, Ontario
http://www.vicwhit.com
Jeff McNeal wrote:
>
> Here's something that might help to solve the DOT 5 debate once and for all
> (yeah, right!). Has anyone on this list converted to DOT 5, then decided to
> convert back to DOT 4 for any reason? I've yet to hear of someone doing this.
> If you did, why?
>
> There seems to be two distinct camps. Those who have converted to DOT 5 and
> everyone else who doggedly stick to DOT 4 because it's familar, comfortable
> and recommended by the manufacturer. Each side seems fervent in their support
> for their fluid of choice, but I haven't heard of anyone who has gone from DOT
> 5 back to anything else. I certainly won't be going back.
>
> Take care,
>
> Jeff McNeal (San Diego)
/// spitfires@autox.team.net mailing list
/// To unsubscribe send a plain text message to majordomo@autox.team.net
/// with nothing in it but
///
/// unsubscribe spitfires
///
|