To: | Gosling_Richard_B@perkins.com |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: Spitfire v. Midget power |
From: | Barry Schwartz <bschwart@pacbell.net> |
Date: | Mon, 26 Mar 2001 05:53:58 -0800 |
> I always assumed that the same tune was used in both engines, > but maybe not? Does anyone know why the Midget was down on power compared to > the Spit? ***************************************** Basically it was due to a less efficient intake and exhaust system. To fit this engine and all it's ancillaries into the confines of the Midget's engine compartment these items were changed to a less free flowing, but more compact design - Barry Schwartz (San Diego) bschwart@pacbell.net |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: SU transplant, Ptegler |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: SU transplant, Joe Curry |
Previous by Thread: | Spitfire v. Midget power, Richard B Gosling |
Next by Thread: | Re: Spitfire v. Midget power, Trevor Boicey |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |