spitfires
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Scrappy's progress

To: spitfires@autox.team.net
Subject: Re: Scrappy's progress
From: PorscheRcr@aol.com
Date: Sun, 22 Oct 2000 12:50:00 EDT
In a message dated 10/22/2000 8:45:22 AM Pacific Daylight Time, 
nugentmd@gte.net writes:

> Just a dumb question without benefit of knowing your original plan:
>  Instead of moving the engine/trans back, why not just cut a section of 
frame 
> and
>  driveshaft out to shorten the whole rig?  That would be another way to 
shift
>  your weight rearward, and a shorter wheelbase turns faster . . .
>  
Lots of probs with that one Mike, sauch as: having to section the body to 
keep the wheels in the fenderwells, the fact that at 83" the wheelbase is 
pretty short already and less would be reallllllllllly twitchy at high 
speeds. ( I road-raced a formula car with a 72" wheelbase... wooohooo).  
While that was a good idea, I suspect the problems associated with just 
setting the engine back are less significant (though perhaps more numerous)

just my $.02
Bill J
'68 GT8

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>