To: | Trevor Boicey <tboicey@brit.ca> |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: Re: MG Midget vs. Spitfire |
From: | Laura.G@141.com (Laura Gharazeddine) |
Date: | Fri, Jun 16 2000 12:40:21 GMT-0600 |
> Sensuous? > > The spitfire always struck me as having curves it hasn't >really grown into yet, sort of like when your 10 year old >daughter tries on all of your wife's fanciest clothes >for Halloween. It's sort of cute in an "I'm trying" kind >of way. I always thought the MkIV/1500 was sensuous too! It's lines are like a big, strong, sleek--phallus! Sensuously masculine-maybe that's why mine have had male names! Laura G.-and 'Nigel' Vita brevis est: rapide agite, vigore strigate! |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: RE: MG Midget vs. Spitfire, Laura Gharazeddine |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: Re: MG Midget vs. Spitfire, Laura Gharazeddine |
Previous by Thread: | Re: RE: MG Midget vs. Spitfire, Laura Gharazeddine |
Next by Thread: | Re: Re: MG Midget vs. Spitfire, Laura Gharazeddine |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |