| To: | Nolan Penney <npenney@mde.state.md.us> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: Swing spring / camber compensator |
| From: | Joe Curry <spitlist@gte.net> |
| Date: | Tue, 13 Jun 2000 08:17:35 -0700 |
Nolan Penney wrote: > > A z-bar needs no more preloading to work then a camber compensator does. The >two are doing the same job. The Z-Bars we were working with in the 60's looked like a Z and had to be twisted to pre load them in the installed position. If they have since changed it's my mistake. Please let this issue drop, I am gettting pretty tired of people ganging up on me on this trying to make me look like a fool on the list! Joe |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: Swing spring / camber compensator, Joe Curry |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | RE: Swing spring / camber compensator, Craig Smith |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Swing spring / camber compensator, Joe Curry |
| Next by Thread: | RE: Swing spring / camber compensator, Craig Smith |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |