spitfires
[Top] [All Lists]

RE: Carb conundrum

To: "'Carter Shore'" <clshore@yahoo.com>,
Subject: RE: Carb conundrum
From: Craig Smith <CraigS@iewc.com>
Date: Tue, 18 Apr 2000 08:57:45 -0500
Damn, my dyno went bad on me yesterday !

I guess I'll have to call that stupid supervisor again, he's probably out
goofing off with the maid !


-----Original Message-----
From: Carter Shore [mailto:clshore@yahoo.com]
Sent: Tuesday, April 18, 2000 8:48 AM
To: Dean Dashwood; spitfires@autox.team.net;
Terrence.Banbury@dnr.state.oh.us
Subject: Re: Carb conundrum



While true that the heavy damper oil will richen the
mixture, it also restricts the airflow.

I believe the Spit Comp manual suggests running the
dampers empty, lightly lubed with 3-in-1 oil or equiv.
We ran them this way on our G-Prod Spitfire. 

There is an element of tuning here. Depends on carb
springs, needles, jetting, and engine mods. The
damping effect should match the responsiveness of your
motor, giving initial richness, then opening up as the
RPM climbs.

Use a G-meter, stopwatch, or dyno to find out what's
best for your setup.

Carter

--- Dean Dashwood <Dean.Dashwood@enron.com> wrote:
> 
> 
> 
> Someone please correct me if I'm wrong here, but
> don't you want a *heavier* oil
> to improve responsiveness?  The more heavy the oil,
> the more damping you get -
> this will keep the throat smaller for longer, bigger
> depression, more fuel going
> in.
> 
> Also, this won't actually improve acceleration from
> a standstill, or straight
> line speed, but will affect the "responsiveness" -
> how quickly the car begins to
> accelerate when you put your foot to the floor -
> like you say.  Again, someone
> please correct me if that's not right.
> 
> Dean
> ---------------


Send online invitations with Yahoo! Invites.
http://invites.yahoo.com

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>