Perhaps I for one was misunderstood. I'm one of those who thought the
airplane shouldn't be a part of the club. I wasn't trying to trivialize
the airplane, nor the many brave people who sacrificed their lives so
the world could perhaps be a better place. I just didn't think it
should be a part of a 'car' club. Any more than I would think the logo
of brave marine, army, navy, air force individuals, or people who
sacrificed themselves for equal rights, or some doctor who 'triumphed'
over some disease, should be a part of the car club, etc., etc., etc.
Only my two cents, only my one vote, I still believe in democracy (at
least until I'm elected world dictator), so I'll go along with the
majority.
Brad
==================
Fred Thomas wrote:
>
> You can please some of the people some of the time, but, not all the people
> all time, it would make no difference what insignia you choose, someone can
> find fault with it for some reason. Seems a little strange that a airplane
> that saved so many lives and also lost so many lives, and is still looked
> upon as a symbol of "Freedom & Sacrifice", could be objected too by a few.
> Take a few minutes and readjust the rearview mirror in your "Toyota". "FT"
|