spitfires
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: WARNING! SPITFIRE VIRUS

To: "Sizemore, Shane" <shane.sizemore@medaphis.com>
Subject: Re: WARNING! SPITFIRE VIRUS
From: John Suchak <suchak@mediaone.net>
Date: Fri, 16 Apr 1999 12:33:20 -0400
Okay, you've got me on the fan...     But *the bumpers*?!?

:^)

JS


Sizemore, Shane wrote:
> 
> I for one like the steering columns, 1/2 wider wheels, blacked out door
> handle surrounds/wiper arms, electric fan AND the bumpers...on the
> 79/80's. (once smog stuff is removed too)..
> 
> back ME up here Patrick!
> 
> Shane Sizemore
> Spitless Again
> Douglasville, GA
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: John Suchak [mailto:suchak@mediaone.net]
> Sent: Friday, April 16, 1999 11:09 AM
> To: Sizemore, Shane; Mike.Hopkins
> Cc: spitfires
> Subject: Re: WARNING! SPITFIRE VIRUS
> 
> Hey Mike:
> 
> The 1500 motor was in all of the 1500 series cars, including the
> pre-smog cars, so that can't be the reason to prefer the '79.  Besides,
> a lot of people will tell you that the 1300 is the way to go for speed,
> because of it's preferable bore/stroke configuration..  (Back me up here
> Kevin Allen!!)
> 
> So I'm still curious why the later ones would be desirable...
> 
> JS
> 
> Mike.Hopkins@mis.magna-europa.com wrote:
> >
> > Er...John how about a 1500 engine and the posibility of 100mph now thats a
> > virus with a mission.
> >
> > John Suchak <suchak@mediaone.net> on 16/04/99 13:43:00
> >
> > Please respond to John Suchak <suchak@mediaone.net>
> >
> >
> >
> >  To:      Metallian6@aol.com
> >
> >  cc:      spitfires@autox.team.net(bcc: Mike
> >           Hopkins/Pers/MISLenham)
> >
> >
> >
> >  Subject: Re: WARNING! SPITFIRE VIRUS
> >
> >
> > Hey James:
> >
> > I'm building a '74 Spit, I'm curious why you like the '79's
> > specifically..   Most people I've met tend to prefer the earlier cars in
> > the squaretail series because of the steel bumpers and lack of emissions
> > equipment (consequently more HP and less hassle).
> >
> > I always thought that bumpers, smog stuff and the lay down radiator were
> > the only differences.  Is there something else that I don't know about?
> > (like bigger brakes or better suspension or something?)
> >
> > Enlighten me!
> >
> > John
> >
> > Metallian6@aol.com wrote:
> > >
> > > The '79 Spitfires are more infected than all the other Spitfires. If you
> > > should happen to see one step back and run away. Then call me. Hehehehehe
> > > I'll take it home for further study. ;-)
> > >
> > > James
> > > Still looking in North Florida area for a '79 Spitfire.
> 
> ------ Message Header Follows ------
> Received: from medaphis.com by corpmail.medaphis.com
>   (PostalUnion/SMTP(tm) v2.2 (Build 22008) for Windows NT(tm))
>   id AA-1999Apr16.110900.1196.680384; Fri, 16 Apr 1999 11:09:01 -0400
> Received: from triumph.cs.utah.edu by medaphis.com (8.6.12/8.6.12) with
> ESMTP
> id
> LAA22359 for <shane.sizemore@medaphis.com>; Fri, 16 Apr 1999 11:06:16
> -0400
> Received: (from majordom@localhost)
>  by triumph.cs.utah.edu (8.9.1/8.9.1) id IAA08089
>  for spitfires-actors; Fri, 16 Apr 1999 08:59:45 -0600 (MDT)
> Message-ID: <37174F72.3C16F7BC@mediaone.net>
> Date: Fri, 16 Apr 1999 10:55:46 -0400
> From: John Suchak <suchak@mediaone.net>
> X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.05 [en] (Win95; I)
> MIME-Version: 1.0
> To: Mike.Hopkins@mis.magna-europa.com
> CC: spitfires@autox.team.net
> Subject: Re: WARNING! SPITFIRE VIRUS
> References: <80256755.0048AC2F.00@mail.MIS.Magna-Europa.com>
> Sender: owner-spitfires@autox.team.net
> Precedence: bulk
> Reply-To: John Suchak <suchak@mediaone.net>
> X-Info: To unsubscribe send mail to majordomo@autox.team.net with
> nothing but
> X-Info:    unsubscribe spitfires
> X-Info: in the body of the message

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>