spitfires
[Top] [All Lists]

RE: 3 rail to 1 rail

To: "Gambony, Jim" <jim.gambony@eds.com>
Subject: RE: 3 rail to 1 rail
From: Ray Bryant <photoray@flash.net>
Date: Tue, 2 Mar 1999 09:56:27 -0500
Jim,
The difference in drive shaft length is when an overdrive is added isn't
it?  I'm not putting in an overdrive.
Ray


At 9:54 AM -0500 3/2/99, Gambony, Jim wrote:
>Ray,
>
>You're gonna need the single rail tranny driveshaft too....  the single rail
>tranny is longer (roughly 2" if memory serves).
>
>The slave should work fine... if it was working before the swap  :-)
>
>
>Jim
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From:        Ray Bryant [SMTP:photoray@flash.net]
>> Sent:        Monday, March 01, 1999 9:33 PM
>> To:  spitfires@autox.team.net
>> Subject:     3 rail to 1 rail
>>
>> Hey Y'all,
>> I hate to brag, but the weather here in Texas has been incredible.  I was
>> out today with the top down and wearing a t-shirt.  But this Saturday I am
>> putting in a single rail gear box to replace my worn out 3 rail gear box.
>> I'm getting a new clutch kit to match the new gear box, but I wasn't sure
>> whether I should replace the slave cylinder.  I was told that there is no
>> difference, but I just wanted to make sure.  Let me know if this is right
>> or wrong.
>> Thanks, Ray
>>
>> **********************************************************************
>> Ray Bryant
>> Keller, Texas
>> '73 Spitfire 1500 (FM6879U), Daily driver
>> Red River Triumph Club http://www.imagin.net/~hensley/rrtc.html
>> Bryant Studios Photography http://www.flash.net/~photoray
>> **********************************************************************
>>




<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>