Ahhh,
You forgot. I said stock to stock. How does 150 to 200 sound without
too much work? Remember horse power to weight ratio!
Nelson
On Wed, 25 Nov 1998 10:11:45 -0800 "Laura G." <savercool@email.msn.com>
writes:
>All that trouble for only 25bhp more? tsk tsk.
>
>Laura G. and Nigel
>-----Original Message-----
>From: rotorheadx2@juno.com <rotorheadx2@juno.com>
>To: savercool@email.msn.com <savercool@email.msn.com>;
>spitfires@autox.team.net <spitfires@autox.team.net>
>Date: Tuesday, November 24, 1998 8:43 PM
>Subject: Re: Rotary Spitfire
>
>
>>I really must jump in on this one. I love RX-7s and Spitfires. They
>are
>>both great cars for their time. I grew up in England when the
>Spitfire
>>was the rage over there. Always loved the body style. However, the
>car
>>does lack under the hood. Now I realize that the technology wasn't
>the
>>same when the Spit was first begun, but 75 hp is not very much for a
>2100
>>lb car. ( I may be off there, but that is the number I remember).
>I
>>think the hmmm that the rotary makes is pretty awesome, especially
>when I
|