spitfires
[Top] [All Lists]

re:triumph false advertising

To: undisclosed-recipients:;
Subject: re:triumph false advertising
From: Tom Carney <tcarney@concentric.net>
Date: 4/6/1998 14:22
--==pw_boundary==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii

  When you say you can sit on your rear deck you certainlty 
have to place yourself on the support bar that runs across 
the wheel arches.  If you sat on the side of the tire you 
would fall right through.  Well I would but I am using some 
type 1/8" plywood.  I'm not sure what it is I found it in 
the garage.  What a pain to cut out a pattern for that 
thing without a previous rear deck or carpet.  
     Well as far as the dash goes, it is hard to tell.  The 
picture is from the passenger seat so it is a side shot of 
half the dash.  But I didn't think that the GT6's ever had 
a black dash.  The wood dash was there to give the GT6 a 
more refined look over the Spitfire.  Did the GT6 ever have 
a round shift knob?  
Tom 

> > One 
> >pic has a woman sitting on the rear deck of a car!  
> *************************************
> I assume you mean with the rear hatch open and sitting on 
the parcel or
> luggage area.  I could certainly sit on this and have.  
It's much thicker
> (at least twice or three times as thick) as the panels 
used on the doors
> and would have no problem holding more than 120 lbs of 
person as I weigh
> slightly more (ahem).  The original one on mine was 
pretty ratty, and when
> I re-manufactured mine I took door panel material and 
laminated several
> pieced together to get the stock thickness and used a 
saber saw to cut it out.
> ************************************** 
> >did spitfires have vinyl covered dashes at one 
> >time?  
> **************************************
> The 72 Spitfire, while not vinyl covered, did have a 
matte plastic, moulded
> dash, not unlike the GT6, without the eyeball vents due 
to impending US
> reg,s at the time concerning reflective surfaces in the 
cockpit - and I
> wouldn't swear to it (don't have my reference material, 
and memory isn't
> what it used to be), but I would imagine the GT6 also 
carried this
> configuration.  Also In 73 they went to the wooden, 
albeit matte finish.
> So it may indeed be a  GT6 of 72 vintage - you didn't say 
which year-look
> for the eyeball vents. 
> 
> Barry Schwartz (San Diego) bschwart@pacbell.net
> 
> 72 V6 Spitfire (daily driver)
> 70 GT6+ (when I don't drive the Spit)
> 70 Spitfire (project)
> 73 Ford Courier (parts hauler, rain vehicle, getting a V6 
soon!)
> 

--==pw_boundary==--


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>