I think that the gen3 platform is leaps and bounds
above the gen1/2 in terms of quality and construction.
If I HAD to drive another automatic SHO, I'd probably
end up with a gen3.
Ian
--- "Hartberger, Jason M. AT2 (AW)"
<hartbejm@cvn71.navy.mil> wrote:
> Ha! Ask me how I feel about aircraft carriers! <G>
>
> I personally can't complain about my SHO, now that I
> have a good (anchor
> brand) motor mount, new tires, freshly bled brakes
> and bias plugs, my
> car is running more bad-assed than it ever has
> before. Mm-mm good! I
> love SHOs!
>
> Yeah, gen3s are poser SHOs. Nice exhaust, yes,
> nice(r) rims, yes. An
> SHO? Not by a long shot. I can stamp "SHO" into a
> 3.8l duratec intake
> and call it a SHO... doesn't make it a SHO. :)
>
> Jason
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: shotimes-admin@autox.team.net
> [mailto:shotimes-admin@autox.team.net] On Behalf Of
> van Oss
> Sent: Wednesday, July 26, 2006 8:42 PM
> To: Paul Nimz; `V6 SHOtimes
> Subject: Re: [Shotimes] OT - BMW 540i for sale
>
> JHC what has become of us. You'd have a Gen3 SHO
> over "any other spiffy
>
> Taurus"?
>
> Okay: I'd take a new beer over a used one. So
> what?
>
> I guess I'm a little burnt out on SHOs right about
> now.
> Joseph "rode hard and put away wet" van Oss
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> Still, I would have the Gen 3 over any other spiffy
> Taurus though.
> Paul
> _______________________________________________
> Shotimes mailing list
> Shotimes@autox.team.net
> http://www.team.net/mailman/listinfo/shotimes
> _______________________________________________
> Shotimes mailing list
> Shotimes@autox.team.net
> http://www.team.net/mailman/listinfo/shotimes
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com
_______________________________________________
Shotimes mailing list
Shotimes@autox.team.net
http://www.team.net/mailman/listinfo/shotimes
|