shotimes
[Top] [All Lists]

RE: [Shotimes] Re: Laser Speed Monitoring

To: "'SHOtimes'" <shotimes@autox.team.net>
Subject: RE: [Shotimes] Re: Laser Speed Monitoring
From: "Kerby Haltom" <g.kerby@sbcglobal.net>
Date: Sat, 24 Jun 2006 08:02:30 -0500
But that is not a warning.  That is a real ticket.  The Judge decides to
allow it to be deferred.

Kerby

-----Original Message-----
From: shotimes-admin@autox.team.net [mailto:shotimes-admin@autox.team.net]
On Behalf Of bjshov8
Sent: Friday, June 23, 2006 8:49 PM
To: 'SHOtimes'
Subject: Re: [Shotimes] Re: Laser Speed Monitoring

Some jurisdictions have "deferred adjudication" (don't know if I spelled it 
right or no).  I'm not a lawyer but the way I understand this is that the 
court holds the original complaint for a probationary period, and you pay 
court costs instead of a fine.  If you do not get convicted of a second 
infraction within the probationary period then the court dismisses the 
original complaint.  If you get caught a second time, then the court sticks 
you with both infractions.  Of course the court does not have to share the 
court costs with the state.

> I would bet that if the laws were checked closely, that $75 "Warning" 
> would be illegal.  Also I bet that the money never got to the city, 
> probably in someone's pocket.
_______________________________________________
Shotimes mailing list
Shotimes@autox.team.net
http://www.team.net/mailman/listinfo/shotimes
_______________________________________________
Shotimes mailing list
Shotimes@autox.team.net
http://www.team.net/mailman/listinfo/shotimes

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>