To: | shop-talk@autox.team.net |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: [Shop-talk] annoying calls |
From: | Bob Spidell via Shop-talk <shop-talk@autox.team.net> |
Date: | Thu, 28 Mar 2019 07:27:45 -0700 |
Delivered-to: | mharc@autox.team.net |
Delivered-to: | shop-talk@autox.team.net |
References: | <20190327072104.3A1D6258994B@autox.team.net> <CAOEriinMoAsm7U-3JmTDe2=z65rDuDM2ERN5QZCs=FKj52-pyA@mail.gmail.com> <2630ED369BCC464DB184F2E2AD436861@RYPC> |
User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.6.0 |
... and: https://www.sfgate.com/opinion/article/Why-are-we-getting-so-many-robocalls-13721216.php On 3/27/2019 9:28 AM, Randall via Shop-talk wrote: > In some cases, even a phone number is not required! > > I used to have an old dial-type phone mounted on the wall in the garage, > wired into the house phone line. I left it there even after having the > house service disconnected. It didn't even have a dial tone! And our old > number was quickly reassigned to someone else. > > But it would still ring every once in a great while. If I answered, it > would be some sort of political advertisement recording. > > My theory is that the political campaign had some kind of deal with the > local exchange, to place calls from their switch directly to all connected > lines, even those not provisioned with a number. > > -- Randall > > _______________________________________________ Shop-talk@autox.team.net Archive: http://www.team.net/pipermail/shop-talk |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: [Shop-talk] 4 post lift for dually with dump bed, John Innis via Shop-talk |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [Shop-talk] 4 post lift for dually with dump bed, Brian Kemp via Shop-talk |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [Shop-talk] annoying calls, Randall via Shop-talk |
Next by Thread: | Re: [Shop-talk] annoying calls, Bob Spidell via Shop-talk |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |