Subject: | [Shop-talk] Running power to the shop |
---|---|
From: | fishplate at gmail.com (Jeff Scarbrough) |
Date: | Mon, 2 Apr 2012 14:58:59 -0400 |
References: | <1d36294e.3de9b2.135f3750bba.Webtop.45@charter.net> <CAFnfnRXWMBVj165VkUqr5JRuY5gj7VyYfckfd74OaKc_JHD5HA@mail.gmail.com> <CAO8Q7CNkrD34LkT-8spEmvoho3-w7mZpW-gov7mgnP9-E-2Ohw@mail.gmail.com> <4F597E77.9010907@xxiii.com> <CA+k5suqie_DmXRis+1_k5pHLE_ABbDuTT2ybn106jN+BJT+Lgg@mail.gmail.com> <4F59878D.60303@xxiii.com> <00e601ccfdb2$5aa153f0$0301a8c0@randall> <CAFnfnRXdCBO19CDd-0_w1PZ4_zFDc4zfmQ77GUDG2JtM0U0pOw@mail.gmail.com> <CAFnfnRWJ1iKCk=OWPcN_0k_H7hVSy9D70CE_-=qG34PoU_8iXA@mail.gmail.com> |
On Mon, Apr 2, 2012 at 2:05 PM, Ian McFetridge <shop-talk2 at mcfetridge.org> wrote: > I have to plead my case to the inspector when he comes > back, showing him the test date and the OSHA statement. If that fails, > I'll have to use a different interlock. BUYER BEWARE, interlock's website > says nothing about the loss of UL certification. Looking at the interlock on http://www.interlockkit.com/ , I can't see any reason to not accept it. It's purely mechanical, doesn't look as if it could wear out, and absent any bending of the metal, there's no apparent way it couldn't do what it claims to do. |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | [Shop-talk] Running power to the shop, Ian McFetridge |
---|---|
Next by Date: | [Shop-talk] Building a shed on skids, cornerexit |
Previous by Thread: | [Shop-talk] Running power to the shop, Ian McFetridge |
Next by Thread: | [Shop-talk] Running power to the shop, Ian McFetridge |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |